Talking about a
prenuptial agreement will be both logical and emotional. Begin with
a general discussion of planning your financial and personal lives together.
Talk about your dreams, your careers, whether or not you want children,
and what kind of lifestyle you seek. Talk about your expectations of
the marriage and of the other person. Discuss your respective roles
in this new relationship.
Your goal is to
create a positive atmosphere that protects and enhances each of your
commitments to a long-term relationship. We suggest that you be guided
by three fundamental rules when negotiating your prenuptial agreement:
-
Every action
each partner takes should protect or enhance the proposed marriage.
-
Apply objective
criteria to initially determine what is reasonable and fair.
-
Deviate from
those objective criteria when there is good reason and you mutually
and genuinely agree that deviation is fair to each of you.
This is what is
meant about the approach we are suggesting:
Actions
Must Protect Or Enhance Proposed Marriage
Treat each other
with respect and as peers. You each bring something different and valuable
to your relationship. What you bring to this relationship and long-term
commitment is of equal value to what the other person brings. You do
not want to take any actions in your negotiations that in any way encourages
or ultimately causes a breakdown in your relationship. It is well known
that divorce is one of the most emotionally painful experiences in life.
Each partner's actions should protect or enhance your relationship to
decrease any probability that a divorce or breakup of that relationship
may ever occur. Each person's goal should be to make the prenuptial
or cohabitation agreement meaningless because a divorce or breakup in
the relationship will never take place.
Objective Criteria To Measure Fairness
Florida law provides
a comprehensive set of rules and public policy establishing what is
fair in the event of death or divorce. The prenuptial agreement will
ultimately be judged against those standards, and if the agreement is
found wanting, it will be ignored. Your lawyers can and should explain
the rules that apply if you and your partner don't change them. The
prenuptial agreement should clarify areas of ambiguity or discretion.
It should deal with special situations likely to arise in the context
of this marriage, considering the ages and circumstances of each partner.
Good
Cause To Deviate From Objective Criteria
There should be
a rational, logical reason for deviating from the criteria against which
the prenuptial agreement may be judged in the event of death or divorce.
The court may very likely ignore such prenuptial agreements as the product
of fraud, duress, or coercion rather than the result of a bargained
for exchange and balancing of interests. So it is important to avoid
"take it or else" statements.
Avoid taking any
positions that are the result of undue power or disrespect for the other
person. The proposed marriage is not likely to work for any significant
period of time if this is how it starts.
Rational, logical
reasons for deviating from those objective criteria evidence a balancing
of interests that respond to specific concerns in the proposed marriage.
A good example of a reason to deviate from objective standards is when
you are both independently wealthy, have children from prior relationships,
and wish your respective estates to go to your children rather than
your new spouse who doesn't need it anyway.